Skip to content

Shopping bag

Your shopping bag is empty

Article: A Short History of the Swim Short

A Short History of the Swim Short

A pair of faded swim shorts lying on white sand.

The garment we make had to be legalized. This is not a metaphor.

In 1916, the city beaches on Chicago’s Lake Michigan set out how a man could dress for the water. A suit could sit no lower on the chest than the armpits. Bottoms could rise no more than four inches above the knee, and needed a skirt effect over the trunks, or a long shirt worn over the top. The alternative was flannel knee pants, a belt, and a vest. Cities up and down both coasts wrote their own versions. Getting it wrong was not a fashion problem. It was an arrest for indecent exposure.

So for the first decades of the century, men swam in wool, in one-piece suits that drank half the sea on the way out of it. The twenties loosened the cut but not the rules. Then the thirties arrived with two weapons: stretch yarn, which let a suit actually fit, and Johnny Weissmuller, the Olympic swimmer turned Tarzan, who lent his name to a line of standalone trunks. America was not ready yet.

Archive photographs: a beach officer measuring a bathing suit hemline in Washington in 1922, and men in one-piece wool swimsuits.
Left: Washington, 1922. A bathing beach officer measures a hemline against the local ordinance. Right: men in regulation one-piece wool. Built for modesty, not movement.

America came around the hard way. Men kept stripping the tops off anyway, and kept getting arrested for it, on public beaches from Atlantic City to Galveston. In the summer of 1936, the protests organized into what the papers called the no-shirt movement. By 1937 the holdouts were giving in, and trunks alone were becoming legal on the American beach.

Which means the swim short, as a garment a man can simply wear, is not yet a hundred years old. It is younger than the zipper it sometimes carries. Everything since has been refinement: the postwar boxer cut, the loud cabana sets of the fifties, the brief, the boardshort, and the long correction back toward the tailored mid-length this house has chosen.

We build at the end of that story, and the lesson we take from it is the original one. The men of 1936 were not fighting for a garment. They were fighting for less garment: for the right to meet the water without unnecessary cloth. Reduction was the founding act of this category. A pair of shorts, cut to move, in a fabric the sea cannot bully. It took two decades of argument and arrest to allow it. The least we can do is make it properly.

More from the Journal

Haenyeo divers resting on volcanic rocks at Jeju in 1971, floats and hooks beside them.
Water Culture

One Breath

The record book opens in 1950. The work is at least three thousand years older.

Read more
A swimmer gliding underwater in green-blue open water.
Move

The Sport That Doesn’t Spend You

Every sport borrows from the body. One of them pays it back.

Read more